Money Scripts and Financial Inheritance: What the Research Does and Does Not Show

Money habits can run in families, but the research supports learning and household conditions, not proven biological inheritance. The Klontz money script studies show correlations from one 422-person pilot sample. Human evidence that stress passes to children through epigenetic marks is small, observational and debated. Explanations based on childhood brainwaves or mirror neurons are untested.

Many people notice that they handle money the way a parent did, or in deliberate opposition to a parent. Traditional economic theory assumes a rational actor who weighs costs and benefits. Financial psychology researchers point out that beliefs formed early in life also shape money decisions, and they call these beliefs "money scripts."

The MyMoneyCoach Research Team wrote this review. It is not an independent validation or peer-reviewed study. The review covers three things: what the Klontz Money Script Inventory (KMSI) research actually found, what the human research on epigenetics and intergenerational stress does and does not show, and which tools practitioners use to work with money patterns. Where a popular claim has no support in the cited research, we say so. Nothing here is medical or mental health advice. If money stress is affecting your health, talk with a qualified professional.

---

I. Money Scripts: What the KMSI Research Found

Psychologists Brad Klontz and Ted Klontz hypothesized that money scripts are beliefs about money that are (a) developed in childhood, (b) often passed down in family systems, (c) typically unconscious, (d) tied to the context in which they formed, and (e) drivers of adult financial behavior.¹ ² The childhood-origin claim is a hypothesis. The KMSI study measured the beliefs. It did not test how they were acquired.

What the study was. Klontz, Britt, Mentzer and Klontz (2011) asked 422 people to rate their agreement with 72 money-related beliefs on a six-point scale. The sample was a convenience sample recruited through web-survey links, and the authors describe it as a pilot study. A factor analysis found four groups of beliefs: money avoidance, money worship, money status and money vigilance. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha) ranged from .70 for vigilance to .84 for avoidance.¹ The authors list limits, including that web survey respondents may differ from people who did not respond.¹

A later article by Klontz and Britt (2012) used a 422-person convenience sample of mostly middle-aged, mostly White (82 percent), highly educated respondents. The authors state it is not representative of the US population.³ All of these findings are correlations from surveys. They do not show that a script causes a behavior or an income level.

1. Money Avoidance

Typical avoidance items include "I do not deserve a lot of money when others have less than me," "Rich people are greedy," "It is hard to be rich and be a good person," and "It is hard to accept financial gifts from others."¹

In the 2011 sample, higher avoidance scores went with being younger, non-White and unmarried, and with lower education, income and net worth.¹ The 2012 article reported that avoidance scores predicted overspending, compulsive buying, financial dependence, hoarding and financial denial.³ These are statistical associations in one convenience sample.

2. Money Worship

Typical worship items include "Things would get better if I had more money," "More money will make you happier," and "You can never have enough money."¹

In the 2011 sample, worship scores went with a similar demographic pattern as avoidance, plus carrying credit card balances from month to month.¹ The 2012 article reported that worship scores predicted compulsive buying, hoarding, workaholism, financial dependence, financial enabling and financial denial, and were associated with lower income, lower net worth and revolving credit card debt.³ The research does not explain why people hold this belief, and the idea that it fills an "internal void" is not tested in these studies.

3. Money Status

Typical status items include "I will not buy something unless it is new," "People are only as successful as the amount of money they earn," and "Poor people are lazy."¹

In the 2011 sample, status scores went with being younger, non-White and unmarried, with lower education and income, and with lower childhood socioeconomic status.¹ The 2012 article reported that status scores predicted compulsive buying, pathological gambling, financial dependence and financial infidelity.³ We found no support in the cited studies for claims about status scripts and general well-being or anxiety, so we have removed them.

4. Money Vigilance

Typical vigilance items include "You should not tell others how much money you have or make," "Money should be saved not spent," and "I would be a nervous wreck if I did not have money saved for an emergency."¹

The two Klontz studies differ here. In the 2011 sample, vigilance scores were not significantly correlated with age, income or net worth (the lowest income quartile scored somewhat higher than the third), and were associated with not carrying credit card debt from month to month.¹ The 2012 article reported that vigilance scores were associated with higher income and net worth and negatively predicted compulsive buying.³ The cited studies do not show that vigilance causes anxiety or a lower quality of life, so we do not claim that.

Table 1: What the Klontz studies reported for each script (correlations, not causes)

Script Type	Example item	Reported in the 2011 pilot (n = 422)¹	Reported in the 2012 article³
Money Avoidance	"Rich people are greedy."	Younger, lower education, income and net worth	Predicted overspending, compulsive buying, dependence, hoarding, denial
Money Worship	"You can never have enough money."	Similar to avoidance, plus carrying card balances	Predicted compulsive buying, hoarding, workaholism, dependence, enabling, denial; lower income and net worth
Money Status	"I will not buy something unless it is new."	Younger, lower education, income and childhood SES	Predicted compulsive buying, gambling, dependence, financial infidelity
Money Vigilance	"Money should be saved not spent."	No significant link to age, income or net worth; no month-to-month card debt	Higher income and net worth; negatively predicted compulsive buying

---

II. Childhood Brains, Mirror Neurons and Epigenetics: What Is Actually Known

Some popular writing says money beliefs are "biologically encoded" in childhood by brainwave states, mirror neurons and inherited epigenetic marks. This section separates what the cited research found from what is speculation. No study cited here tests whether any of these mechanisms produces money scripts.

1. Childhood Brain Rhythms

Brain electrical activity measured with EEG changes through childhood. Hill and colleagues (2022) studied 139 children aged 4 to 12 and reported that the aperiodic exponent and offset both decreased with age, and that the alpha peak frequency (adjusted for the aperiodic signal) increased with age.¹⁴ That is the extent of what we verified.

Popular books claim that children aged 2 to 7 are in a "theta" state like hypnosis, that they have no critical filter, and that money messages are "downloaded" as fixed truth. We could not find research support for these claims, and no study we reviewed links childhood brainwave frequency to the formation of money beliefs. We removed those claims and the popular books that made them. Children do learn about money from their families. How they learn is a question for developmental psychology, not something brainwave data has answered.

2. Observational Learning and Mirror Neurons

Social learning theory, the idea that people pick up beliefs and behaviors by watching others, is well established, and Klontz and colleagues cite it as a basis for money scripts.¹ ¹⁸

Mirror neurons were first found in area F5 of the monkey premotor cortex. They fire both when the animal performs an action and when it watches another individual perform a similar action. Rizzolatti and Craighero (2004) review this work in monkeys and the evidence for a similar system in humans, which is mostly indirect.¹⁵ Catmur, Walsh and Heyes (2009) argue that experience shapes how the mirror system develops, which is a point about imitation rather than money.²⁰

We found no study showing that mirror neurons transmit parents' money stress or financial habits to children. That idea is a hypothesis, and we have removed the earlier text that described it as established.

3. Can Trauma Be Inherited Through Epigenetics?

Epigenetics studies how chemical marks such as DNA methylation change gene activity without changing the DNA sequence. Whether stress or trauma leaves such marks that reach the next generation in humans is an open scientific question.

What one small study found. Yehuda and colleagues (2016) measured FKBP5 methylation, a gene involved in stress regulation, in 32 Holocaust survivors, 22 of their adult children, and comparison groups of 8 parents and 9 offspring. Survivors showed higher methylation than comparison parents, while their offspring showed lower methylation than comparison offspring. Methylation levels in parents and their children were correlated.⁵³ This is a small observational study. It cannot show that the effect was passed down or what it means for behavior.

What a major review concluded. Yehuda and Lehrner (2018) reviewed the field. Their abstract says that "the most compelling work to date has been done in animal models" and that, "given the paucity of human studies and the methodological challenges in conducting such studies, it is not possible to attribute intergenerational effects in humans to a single set of biological or other determinants at this time."²¹ The review also describes effects programmed by the child's own early environment, such as maternal care after birth and stress exposure in the womb, which are different from changes carried in a parent's germline.²¹ Bowers and Yehuda (2016) review biological differences that have been reported in children of stress-exposed parents.²³ Kellermann (2013) discusses the epigenetic hypothesis for Holocaust trauma.²²

A replication, and what it points to. Bierer and colleagues (2020), from the same research group as the 2016 study, measured FKBP5 methylation in blood from 125 offspring of Holocaust survivors and 31 comparison volunteers. Methylation at site 6 was lower in the offspring, an effect associated with maternal Holocaust exposure in childhood. The authors wrote that this "implicates maternal developmental programming as a putative mechanism."⁶⁴ Developmental programming means effects of the child's own early environment, which is different from a mark carried through the germline. The studies used blood samples from small groups, came from one lab, and were not about money.

Critiques. Horsthemke (2018) writes that transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans is "the matter of controversial debate, mostly because the study of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is confounded by genetic, ecological and cultural inheritance."⁶⁵ A meta-analysis of 32 samples with 4,418 participants found that "in the set of adequately designed nonclinical studies, no evidence for the influence of the parents' traumatic Holocaust experiences on their children was found," and that secondary traumatization "emerged only in studies on clinical participants."⁶⁶ That meta-analysis covers one trauma population and is older, so it does not settle every case. Taken together, the human evidence does not support presenting biological inheritance of trauma as established.

What this means for money. We found no study showing that scarcity or financial stress is passed to children through epigenetic marks, or that any such mark produces a money script. Earlier versions of this paper said children can be "born with a predisposition" toward Money Vigilance or Money Worship because of an ancestor's economic hardship. That is not supported, and we have removed it. It is reasonable to say that families transmit money habits through what they say, do and model. The biological route remains unproven.

4. What the Research Does Support: Household and Family Routes

Several lines of research are better supported than any biological route. None of them tests money scripts as the KMSI defines them, and each has limits.

Parents and children's money behavior. Webley and Nyhus (2006) report that parental behavior, such as discussing financial matters with children, and parental orientations such as conscientiousness and future orientation have a modest but consistent link to children's economic behavior, including in adulthood.⁶⁰ We saw that abstract through a secondary source. Jorgensen and Savla (2010) surveyed 420 college students and found that perceived parental influence had "an indirect and moderately significant influence on financial behavior, mediated through financial attitude," but "did not have an effect on financial knowledge."⁶¹ Lusardi, Mitchell and Curto (2010), using a US national youth survey from 1997, found that young adults whose parents held stocks and retirement savings were more likely to know about risk diversification.⁶² The last two disagree about whether parents pass on knowledge, and they used different measures. The effects are modest and mostly self-reported.

Household money strain. In the Family Stress Model, economic hardship leads to economic pressure, which is associated with parental emotional distress and couple conflict, which is associated with harsh parenting and child problem behavior. Neppl, Senia and Donnellan (2016) tested this over time in 273 families, and the pathway held after controlling for the child's earlier behavior.⁵⁸ Masarik and Conger (2017) review the model and report that most researchers used longitudinal designs and that the causal order replicated "among a diverse set of families varied in structure, ethnic background, and geographic location."⁵⁹ The outcome in this research is child behavior, not adult money habits.

Childhood adversity and adult money security. Harter and Harter (2022) analyzed a national health survey and found that, at various income levels, financial stress in adulthood (measured as food and housing security) is related to remembered childhood adversity.⁵⁷ That is a cross-sectional association with narrow money measures. Currie and Widom (2010) used a prospective cohort design: court-substantiated cases of childhood abuse and neglect from 1967 to 1971 were matched with comparison children and followed to a mean age of 41 (N = 807). The maltreated group had lower education, employment and earnings and fewer assets, with a 14% gap in the probability of employment in middle age, and the effects differed between men and women.⁵⁶ The cases came from one US region, and assets are a coarse measure. Felitti and colleagues (1998) found a graded relationship between the number of childhood adversity categories and adult health risks in 9,508 adults, but that study is about health, not money, and relies on recall.⁵⁵ Prospective data fit a causal reading for money outcomes, but there is no randomized evidence, and family income, genes and parenting overlap.

Economic position persists across generations. Chetty, Hendren, Kline and Saez (2014) used data on more than 40 million parent-child pairs and reported a rank-rank slope of about 0.34, which means a 10-point rise in a parent's income rank goes with about a 3.4-point rise in the child's.⁶³ That describes income persistence, not psychology, and the variation between areas is large. We read it through a secondary summary of the abstract. It matters here because it is one route by which money patterns can run in families with no biological claim at all.

---

III. Financial Flashpoints

Klontz and colleagues use the term "financial flashpoint" for a painful, distressing or dramatic money-related event that leaves a lasting imprint into adulthood. As summarized in descriptions of their work, examples include losses during the Great Depression, parental abandonment, or a family member's financial bailout.² A flashpoint can also be a repeated message, such as "money is the root of all evil." This is a clinical concept from their writing. We did not find a controlled study that tests it, and we did not verify claims that the brain "locks" a belief through the amygdala, so we have removed them.

Klontz and Klontz hypothesized that scripts are tied to the setting in which they formed.¹ ² For example, hiding money may have made sense in a household where it was not safe to have it. A belief that fit a childhood home may fit an adult life less well. This is a hypothesis about how scripts work, offered in the KMSI literature, and the 2011 study did not test it.

---

IV. Tools for Noticing Money Patterns

1. The Klontz Money Script Inventory

The KMSI was built to give practitioners a fast way to see which money beliefs a client holds. It gives practitioners a short self-report measure of money beliefs.¹ It uses a six-point agreement scale (1 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree).¹ It is a research and coaching tool from a pilot sample. It is not a diagnosis, and a score cannot predict what any one person will do. The shorter revised version (KMSI-R) has reliability support from its developers: Taylor, Klontz and Britt (2016) reported high reliability and weak-to-moderate correlations with another money attitudes scale in a student sample of 326.⁶⁷ An independent 2025 report funded by the National Endowment for Financial Education found that factorial validity was not supported, with poor fit indices for the four-factor model.⁶⁸ We read that report only through secondary descriptions, so check the primary source before relying on its details. Read the four scripts as a conversation tool, not a settled measurement.

Sample items from the inventory:

• Avoidance: "I do not deserve a lot of money when others have less than me"; "Rich people are greedy"; "It is hard to be rich and be a good person."¹
• Worship: "Things would get better if I had more money"; "More money will make you happier"; "You can never have enough money."¹
• Status: "I will not buy something unless it is new"; "Your self-worth equals your net worth"; "People are only as successful as the amount of money they earn."¹
• Vigilance: "I would be a nervous wreck if I did not have money saved for an emergency"; "You should not tell others how much money you have or make."¹

In the 2011 sample, higher status scores went with younger age and lower education.¹

2. The Financial Genogram

A genogram is a family-tree diagram used in family therapy to map relationships and patterns across generations. McGoldrick, Gerson and Petry describe the standard method.²⁷ Mumford and Weeks (2003) describe applying a genogram to money.²⁹ We did not verify the specific steps below against those sources, so treat them as a common way to do the exercise rather than a tested protocol.

A common approach. The person draws their family tree, often covering three generations, and adds notes on each person's work, money habits, and any money events or family rules they know about. Questions people use to start include "What did you learn from your parents about money?" and "Was there a family secret about money?" These questions are examples, not a validated instrument.

Looking for patterns. The aim is to notice whether certain money events or rules repeat. A made-up example: a grandparent who lived through scarcity saved obsessively, a parent in turn spent freely, and the grandchild feels pulled in both directions. We did not find studies showing that genogram work changes financial behavior or wellbeing, so we do not claim it does.

---

V. Cognitive Restructuring

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) includes techniques for testing a belief against evidence and replacing it with a more balanced one.³³ ³⁴ ³⁵ This section describes the technique. The cited sources are general CBT books and papers. We did not find a study of these exercises applied to money scripts in particular.

1. Name the belief. For example, "I am terrible with money."
2. Examine the evidence. Ask what supports the belief and what points the other way.
   • Evidence for: "I spent too much on clothes last month."
   • Evidence against: "I have paid my rent on time for 5 years and have no credit card debt."
3. Write a more balanced version. For example, "I overspend on accessories sometimes, and I reliably cover my fixed expenses."

Core beliefs tend to be harder to shift than passing thoughts, and CBT practitioners describe repeated practice with worksheets for this.³⁵ Claims that such practice "rewires" particular neural pathways, or that a "growth mindset pathway" overrides a "fixed mindset pathway," are not tested in the sources we checked, and we have removed them.

---

VI. Body-Based Practices

Some financial therapists and coaches teach body-based practices for moments of money stress. The idea is that if bills trigger a strong stress reaction, calming the body first may make planning easier. This is practitioner experience and theory. We found no controlled studies of these practices in financial settings, and none of this is medical or mental health treatment. If you have trauma symptoms or panic, work with a licensed clinician.

Some practitioners also describe the stress response in terms of polyvagal theory, including a "dorsal vagal shutdown" or "freeze" state.⁴⁰ That is a theoretical model used by many clinicians. We did not test it here and do not present it as established fact.

1. The Body Check-In

Financial therapist Bari Tessler teaches a Body Check-In: stopping for a few seconds to a minute and noticing physical sensations before or during a money task.²⁵ A common version looks like this.

1. Notice the body. Are your shoulders raised, your jaw tight, your stomach tense?
2. Notice the breath. Is it shallow, held or fast?
3. Name the feeling. For example, "this is anxiety."

On the third step, one lab study found that putting feelings into words reduced amygdala responses to negative images and increased activity in a part of the right prefrontal cortex.⁵⁴ That study used emotional pictures, not money tasks, and we found no study of the Body Check-In itself.

2. Titration and Pendulation

Peter Levine developed titration and pendulation in Somatic Experiencing.⁴⁵ Titration means breaking a stressful task into small pieces, such as looking at one line of a bank statement and then pausing. Pendulation means shifting attention back and forth between something stressful and something that feels safe or neutral, such as feeling your feet on the floor. They are used in clinical practice. We did not verify research on them in a financial context.

3. Other Calming Tools

The Butterfly Hug, in which you cross your arms over your chest and tap your shoulders in alternation, came from EMDR practitioners working with disaster survivors in Mexico.⁵² We found no evidence on its use for financial anxiety. Grounding exercises such as naming five things you can see, four you can touch and so on are widely taught, and we did not trace them to a specific source. Treat all of these as options to try, not treatments.

Table 2: How the tools fit together (practitioner framework)

Approach	Goal	Example technique	Evidence status
Awareness	Notice patterns	KMSI, financial genogram	KMSI: one 422-person pilot; genogram: no outcome studies found
Cognitive (CBT)	Test and reframe beliefs	Evidence examination, rewriting a belief	General CBT technique; not tested on money scripts in the sources checked
Body-based	Calm the stress response	Body Check-In, titration, pendulation	Practitioner methods; no financial-specific studies found
Behavioral	Build habits	Regular money check-ins, automating savings	Not assessed in this review

---

VII. Conclusion

People often repeat or push against their parents' money patterns. The Klontz research gives a useful way to describe four such patterns, but it comes from a 422-person convenience sample and shows correlations. The human evidence on epigenetic inheritance of trauma rests on small observational studies, a leading review says no single biological or other cause can yet be assigned, and critics point to confounding by genetic, ecological and cultural inheritance. We found no research connecting childhood brainwaves or mirror neurons to money scripts.

What the evidence does support is smaller and still practical. Families teach money habits through what they say and do, though the measured effect of parents is modest. Money strain at home affects children through parental stress and conflict. Documented childhood abuse or neglect is linked to fewer assets and lower earnings in midlife, and economic position persists across generations. Noticing your own beliefs, tracing where they came from, testing them against evidence, and calming your body before hard money tasks are all reasonable things to try. They are tools for building a relationship with money on your own terms, not proven treatments. This is education, not medical advice.

---

Works Cited

1. Klontz, B., Britt, S.L., Mentzer, J., & Klontz, T. (2011). Money Beliefs and Financial Behaviors: Development of the Klontz Money Script Inventory. Journal of Financial Therapy, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/jft.v2i1.451

2. Klontz, B., & Klontz, T. (2009). Mind Over Money: Overcoming the Money Disorders That Threaten Our Financial Health. Broadway Business.

3. Klontz, B.T., & Britt, S.L. (2012). How Clients' Money Scripts Predict Their Financial Behaviors. Journal of Financial Planning, November 2012.

4. (Removed.)

5. (Removed.)

6. (Removed.)

7. (Removed.)

8. (Removed. Duplicate of reference 1.)

9. (Removed.)

10. (Removed.)

11. (Removed.)

12. (Removed.)

13. (Removed.)

14. Hill, A.T., Clark, G.M., Bigelow, F.J., Lum, J.A.G., & Enticott, P.G. (2022). Periodic and aperiodic neural activity displays age-dependent changes across early-to-middle childhood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101076

15. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

16. (Removed.)

17. (Removed.)

18. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.

19. (Removed.)

20. Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. (2009). Associative sequence learning: The role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364(1528), 2369-2380. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0048

21. Yehuda, R., & Lehrner, A. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: Putative role of epigenetic mechanisms. World Psychiatry, 17(3), 243-257. doi:10.1002/wps.20568

22. Kellermann, N.P. (2013). Epigenetic transmission of Holocaust trauma: Can nightmares be inherited? Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 50(1), 33-37. PubMed 24029109

23. Bowers, M.E., & Yehuda, R. (2016). Intergenerational transmission of stress in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(1), 232-244. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.247

24. (Removed.)

25. Tessler, B. (2018). The Art of Money: A Life-Changing Guide to Financial Happiness. Parallax Press.

26. (Removed.)

27. McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and Intervention (3rd ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.

28. (Removed.)

29. Mumford, D.J., & Weeks, G.R. (2003). The money genogram. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 14, 33-44. doi:10.1300/j085v14n03_03

30. (Removed.)

31. (Removed.)

32. (Removed.)

33. Beck, A.T. (1979). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. Penguin Books.

34. Burns, D.D. (1980). Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy. William Morrow and Company.

35. Padesky, C.A. (1994). Schema change processes in cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1(5), 267-278. doi:10.1002/cpp.5640010502

36. (Removed.)

37. (Removed.)

38. (Removed.)

39. (Removed.)

40. Dana, D. (2018). The Polyvagal Theory in Therapy: Engaging the Rhythm of Regulation. W.W. Norton & Company.

41. (Removed. Duplicate of reference 25.)

42. (Removed.)

43. (Removed.)

44. (Removed.)

45. Levine, P.A. (2010). In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness. North Atlantic Books.

46. (Removed.)

47. (Removed.)

48. (Removed.)

49. (Removed.)

50. (Removed.)

51. (Removed.)

52. Artigas, L., & Jarero, I. (2014). The Butterfly Hug method for self-administered bilateral stimulation. In M. Luber (Ed.), Implementing EMDR Early Mental Health Interventions for Man-Made and Natural Disasters. Springer Publishing Company.

53. Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N.P., Bierer, L.M., Bader, H.N., Klengel, T., Holsboer, F., & Binder, E.B. (2016). Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on FKBP5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry, 80(5), 372-380. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005

54. Lieberman, M.D., Eisenberger, N.I., Crockett, M.J., Tom, S.M., Pfeifer, J.H., & Way, B.M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421-428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x

55. Felitti, V.J., Anda, R.F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9635069/

56. Currie, J., & Widom, C.S. (2010). Long-term consequences of child abuse and neglect on adult economic well-being. Child Maltreatment, 15(2), 111-120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20425881/

57. Harter, C.L., & Harter, J.F.R. (2022). The link between adverse childhood experiences and financial security in adulthood. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 43(4), 832-842. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34522076/

58. Neppl, T.K., Senia, J.M., & Donnellan, M.B. (2016). Effects of economic hardship: Testing the family stress model over time. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(1), 12-21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26551658/

59. Masarik, A.S., & Conger, R.D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the Family Stress Model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 85-90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28813301/

60. Webley, P., & Nyhus, E.K. (2006). Parents' influence on children's future orientation and saving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(1), 140-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.016

61. Jorgensen, B.L., & Savla, J. (2010). Financial literacy of young adults: The importance of parental socialization. Family Relations, 59(4), 465-478. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00616.x

62. Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O.S., & Curto, V. (2010). Financial literacy among the young. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 358-380. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01173.x

63. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553-1623. doi:10.1093/qje/qju022

64. Bierer, L.M., et al. (2020). Intergenerational Effects of Maternal Holocaust Exposure on FKBP5 Methylation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 177(8), 744-753. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32312110/

65. Horsthemke, B. (2018). A critical view on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans. Nature Communications, 9, 2973. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30061690/

66. van IJzendoorn, M.H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2003). Are children of Holocaust survivors less well-adapted? A meta-analytic investigation of secondary traumatization. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(5), 459-469. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14584630/

67. Taylor, C.D., Klontz, B., & Britt, S.L. (2016). Reliability and convergent validity of the Klontz Money Script Inventory-Revised (KMSI-R). Journal of Financial Therapy, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1100

68. National Endowment for Financial Education (2025). Report on the factorial validity of the KMSI-R (Reiter et al., Texas Tech University). Seen through secondary descriptions only.